![good video card for mac pro 2013 good video card for mac pro 2013](https://www.howtogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/img_522613f48a8c1.png)
![good video card for mac pro 2013 good video card for mac pro 2013](http://i1.wp.com/www.gottabemobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-inch-MacBook-Pro-Retina-Review-Late-2013-007.jpg)
- #Good video card for mac pro 2013 upgrade#
- #Good video card for mac pro 2013 Bluetooth#
- #Good video card for mac pro 2013 professional#
![good video card for mac pro 2013 good video card for mac pro 2013](https://i1.wp.com/9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/02/mac-pro-teardown.png)
This clever vertical/diagonal packaging for a 3.5” drive in a time capsule could make for a clever packaging for the iMP
#Good video card for mac pro 2013 upgrade#
Plus, having that space will allow 3rd parties to get creative with other more imaginative upgrade possibilities. This could even be cleverly stuffed in an enclosure in a vertical stack orientation like it is in the current Time Capsule and reduce the foot print of any conceived enclosure for the new iMP. You can get an 8TB 3.5” mechanical hard drive for about $250 these days. Even with 4 SSD slots, folks still need some cheap archival space. Have at least one 3.5” Hard Drive Bay.Apple should throw in a minimum of 4 SSD stick-slots to greatly increase storage options for the iMP. So everyone has a rats nest of drives hanging off their trashcan Macs.
#Good video card for mac pro 2013 professional#
As a result, one of the big complaints is that it just doesn't offer enough storage space for professional use ( e.g., a max of 1TB from Apple, or a much slower 2TB drive from OWC). The trashcan Mac has only one slot for SSD memory sticks. The slots will let pro users take care of themselves through the long droughts of time when Apple ignores them. The iMP should have at least 3 or 4 PCI slots so that Pro users can keep their models fresh as well.
#Good video card for mac pro 2013 Bluetooth#
PCI slots have allowed professional owners to upgrade to faster SSDs, to USB 3 and 3.1 (which the trashcan Mac still doesn't have), better video, new Bluetooth and 802.11ac wireless cards, better video capture products, and countless other features that have kept the old cMP fresher than the 'new' trashcan Mac. Have PCI slots! One of the reasons the classic Mac Pro is still relevant and bests the trashcan Mac is that the cMP has PCI slots.Here are my suggestions after noticing a lot of the frustrations in the Mac Pro forums, along with my own. Next: Apple Needs to Reimagine a New and Improved Mac Pro ("iMP") - Apple Needs to Reimagine a New and Improved Mac Pro ("iMP") Here are a couple of more quick examples off the web. It's an ugly, noisy, power hungry rats nest compared to the clean singular cMP it replaced. This Mac Pro doesn't even have a PCI cage (that gets much uglier, fast). It's not likely to work well, and even if it does, it won't be pretty. Trying to run a high end video card through a Rube Goldberg external PCI cage via a Thunderbolt port is like trying to stuff a hippo in a pair of skinny jeans. Poor trashcan Mac users have been forced to live like animals with rats nests of external drives, cables, PCI cages (because lots of people still need expansion cards)-all of these things are big, clunky, with noisy fans (rendering the quietness and compactness of the trashcan Mac meaningless), all while sucking up more power than the tidy integrated cMP.Īdding insult to injury, all those external connections are relatively slow connections when compared to the cMPs fast PCI slots. Video card options for the cMP obliterate the top end options on the trashcan Mac.Īnd the cMP also has tons of additional storage space with room for 2 optical drives, additional power supplies, slots for multiple PCI cards ( e.g., video), drive bays for four 3.5” drives, etc. For storage, you can get larger capacities ( e.g., 2TB, 4TB, and up) as well as way faster SSDs ( e.g., running at near 6GB/sec). In most every other important way, the cMP simply trounces the trashcan Mac. For example, with regard to top end performance, processor-wise, you can get a maxed out 12-core 3.46GHz cMP model that is just as fast as the top end 12-core 2.7GHz trashcan Mac. Right now, a cMP simply spanks the trashcan Mac's performance. Those machines are just better than the trashcan Mac. The latest 2010 and (meaninglessly bumped) 2012 cMP models are particularly coveted in forums like Mac Rumor's Mac Pro forums and holding on to their values well if you look around eBay or Other World Computing.Īnd for good reason. In fact, a lot of professional Mac users are still clutching to their aluminum tower "classic" Mac Pros ("cMP"). Posted by MacRumors' forum member zephonic: For real pros, it's a plain and simple failure. While its trashcan form factor may work well for some (perhaps, as a new Mac mini pro, or maybe Mac Pro mini), it's inadequate for traditional Mac creatives/professionals. I think the "new" Mac Pro ("trashcan Mac") is a joke and it's not just because calling a, once again, forgotten and near abandoned 2013 model "new" in late 2015 is the kind of air-quote irony loved by techno hipsters.